Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 91 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 91
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion.
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). The report ____ by the students last Friday.
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time.
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). This method is ____ reliable than the first one.
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation.
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). We have used this checklist ____ September.
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice.
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small.
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source.
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear.
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____.
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way.
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other.
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible.
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study.
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A group of Grade 9 students wanted to know how often people used a small public park. At first, they counted visitors only on Saturday morning. The number was high, so they concluded that the park was always crowded. Their teacher asked them to repeat the count on weekday mornings, afternoons and evenings. The new data showed a very different pattern. The students then reported that usage depended strongly on time and day.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). What is the main lesson of the passage about community survey?
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). Which action improved the quality of the conclusion?
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). Why was the first conclusion limited?
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim?
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). What would be the best next step?
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 2: B. was completed The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 3: C. repeating A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 4: D. more The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 5: B. who If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 6: C. since A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 7: D. had checked The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 8: A. but A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 9: C. sharing The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 10: D. to read If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 11: A. sample A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 12: B. consistent The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 13: C. causes A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 14: D. similar The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 15: A. limitations If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Nhận xét
The Orchid reporting revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.