Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 90 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 90
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion.
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). The report ____ by the students last Friday.
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time.
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). This method is ____ reliable than the first one.
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation.
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). We have used this checklist ____ September.
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice.
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small.
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source.
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear.
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____.
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way.
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other.
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible.
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study.
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A project team divided work equally by number of tasks. Later, they discovered that some tasks required ten minutes while others required more than an hour. They changed the plan by estimating time and difficulty instead of simply counting tasks. The workload became more balanced.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). What is the main lesson of the passage about team project?
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). Which action improved the quality of the conclusion?
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). Why was the first conclusion limited?
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim?
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). What would be the best next step?
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 2: B. was completed A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 3: C. repeating The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 4: D. more A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 5: B. who The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 6: C. since If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 7: D. had checked A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 8: A. but The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 9: C. sharing A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 10: D. to read The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 11: A. sample If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 12: B. consistent A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 13: C. causes The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 14: D. similar A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 15: A. limitations The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
Nhận xét
The Riverside reporting revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.