Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 26 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 26
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 26, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 26, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 26, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 26, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 26, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 26, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 26, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 26, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 26, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 26, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 26, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 26, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 26, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 26, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 26, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A group of Grade 9 students wanted to know how often people used a small public park. At first, they counted visitors only on Saturday morning. The number was high, so they concluded that the park was always crowded. Their teacher asked them to repeat the count on weekday mornings, afternoons and evenings. The new data showed a very different pattern. The students then reported that usage depended strongly on time and day.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, What is the main lesson of the passage about community survey? (Set 26, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 26, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 26, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 26, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Riverside selection case, What would be the best next step? (Set 26, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 2: B. was completed The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 3: C. repeating A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 4: D. more The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 5: B. who If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 6: C. since A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 7: D. had checked The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 8: A. but A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 9: C. sharing The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 10: D. to read If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 11: A. sample A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 12: B. consistent The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 13: C. causes A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 14: D. similar The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 15: A. limitations If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Nhận xét
The Riverside selection revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.