Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 49 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 49
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 49, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 49, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 49, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 49, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 49, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 49, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 49, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 49, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 49, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 49, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 49, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 49, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 49, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 49, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 49, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
Lan found two websites giving different numbers for the same topic. Instead of choosing the first result, she checked the publication dates, authors and original sources. One page was newer but copied an older claim without evidence. Lan decided to use the source that clearly explained where its data came from.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, What is the main lesson of the passage about online information? (Set 49, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 49, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 49, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 49, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop selection case, What would be the best next step? (Set 49, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 2: B. was completed If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 3: C. repeating A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 4: D. more The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 5: B. who A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 6: C. since The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 7: D. had checked If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 8: A. but A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 9: C. sharing The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 10: D. to read A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 11: A. sample The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 12: B. consistent If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 13: C. causes A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 14: D. similar The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 15: A. limitations A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
Nhận xét
The Workshop selection revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.