Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 74 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 74
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 74, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 74, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 74, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 74, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 74, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 74, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 74, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 74, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 74, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 74, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 74, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 74, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 74, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 74, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 74, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
Lan found two websites giving different numbers for the same topic. Instead of choosing the first result, she checked the publication dates, authors and original sources. One page was newer but copied an older claim without evidence. Lan decided to use the source that clearly explained where its data came from.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, What is the main lesson of the passage about online information? (Set 74, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 74, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 74, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 74, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Stone reasoning case, What would be the best next step? (Set 74, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 2: B. was completed If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 3: C. repeating A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 4: D. more The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 5: B. who A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 6: C. since The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 7: D. had checked If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 8: A. but A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 9: C. sharing The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 10: D. to read A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 11: A. sample The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 12: B. consistent If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 13: C. causes A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 14: D. similar The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 15: A. limitations A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
Nhận xét
The Stone reasoning revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.