Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 81 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 81
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 81, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 81, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 81, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 81, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 81, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 81, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 81, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 81, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 81, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 81, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 81, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 81, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 81, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 81, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 81, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A group of Grade 9 students wanted to know how often people used a small public park. At first, they counted visitors only on Saturday morning. The number was high, so they concluded that the park was always crowded. Their teacher asked them to repeat the count on weekday mornings, afternoons and evenings. The new data showed a very different pattern. The students then reported that usage depended strongly on time and day.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, What is the main lesson of the passage about community survey? (Set 81, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 81, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 81, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 81, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Workshop reasoning case, What would be the best next step? (Set 81, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 2: B. was completed The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 3: C. repeating A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 4: D. more The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 5: B. who If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 6: C. since A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 7: D. had checked The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 8: A. but A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 9: C. sharing The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 10: D. to read If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 11: A. sample A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 12: B. consistent The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 13: C. causes A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 14: D. similar The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 15: A. limitations If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Nhận xét
The Workshop reasoning revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.