Đề ôn thi vào lớp 6 môn Tiếng Anh số 91 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề chính thức của một trường cụ thể và cấu trúc tuyển sinh thực tế có thể khác.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 6 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 91
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language – 4,0 points
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). Choose the best word: Students should ____ their answers before submitting.
A. check
B. checking
C. checked
D. checks - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). Choose the correct form: Mai ____ her plan yesterday.
A. change
B. changed
C. changes
D. is change - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). Choose the best connector: The idea looked good, ____ the first test showed a problem.
A. because
B. so
C. but
D. and - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). Choose the correct preposition: We collected data ____ three different days.
A. at
B. from of
C. by to
D. on - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). Choose the best phrase: If we use a larger sample, the result ____ be more reliable.
A. had
B. may
C. was
D. has If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). Choose the correct comparative: This method is ____ than the old one.
A. usefuler
B. most useful
C. more useful
D. usefully - Câu 7 (0,5 điểm). Choose the correct question: ____ did the team repeat the survey?
A. Who
B. Whose
C. How many
D. Why - Câu 8 (0,5 điểm). Choose the best meaning of “reliable” in a study.
A. likely to give consistent, trustworthy results
B. very colourful
C. very expensive
D. always perfect
Part II. Reading – 3,0 points
Students in Class 5A started a small school garden. At first, they watered every plant with the same amount of water. After two weeks, some plants grew well while others became weak. The class checked the sunlight and soil conditions and discovered that the plants did not have the same needs. They then changed the watering schedule and kept a simple record each day. The garden improved, but the students wrote in their report that the new schedule should be tested for a longer time before they called it the best plan.
- Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). What was the main problem in the passage about school garden?
- Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). What did the students or main character change after noticing the problem?. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). Which detail shows that the first conclusion or plan was incomplete?
- Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). What lesson about checking evidence can be learned from the passage?
- Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). Write one sentence explaining how the situation in school garden could be tested or improved further.
Part III. Writing – 3,0 points
- Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). Rewrite using “because”: “The team changed the plan. The first result was not reliable.”.
- Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). Reorder the words: evidence / before / should / conclusion / a / check / We / making / . If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 3 (1,0 điểm). Write 90–120 words about a time when checking information helped you make a better decision.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Part I. Language
- Câu 1: A. Correct answer: check. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 2: B. Correct answer: changed. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 3: C. Correct answer: but. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 4: D. Correct answer: on. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 5: B. Correct answer: may. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 6: C. Correct answer: more useful. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 7: D. Correct answer: Why. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 8: A. Correct answer: likely to give consistent, trustworthy results. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
Part II. Reading
- Câu 1. The answer should identify the concrete issue described in the passage, not a general problem. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 2. The answer should state the specific change made after the first observation or test. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 3. Use one detail showing that the first plan, sample or conclusion did not include all relevant information. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 4. A strong answer says that conclusions should be based on checked, relevant evidence and may need repeated testing. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 5. Any grammatically correct sentence proposing a fairer test, longer observation, better sample or clearer measure is acceptable. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
Part III. Writing
- Câu 1. The team changed the plan because the first result was not reliable. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 2. We should check evidence before making a conclusion. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 3. The paragraph should have a clear situation, the information checked, the decision made and the result. Accuracy, organisation and appropriate vocabulary are assessed. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
Nhận xét
The Station mapping revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.