Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 30 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 30
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 30, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 30, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 30, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 30, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 30, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 30, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 30, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 30, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 30, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 30, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 30, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 30, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 30, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 30, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 30, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A project team divided work equally by number of tasks. Later, they discovered that some tasks required ten minutes while others required more than an hour. They changed the plan by estimating time and difficulty instead of simply counting tasks. The workload became more balanced.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, What is the main lesson of the passage about team project? (Set 30, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 30, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 30, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 30, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Hilltop selection case, What would be the best next step? (Set 30, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 2: B. was completed A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 3: C. repeating The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 4: D. more A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 5: B. who The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 6: C. since If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 7: D. had checked A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 8: A. but The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 9: C. sharing A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 10: D. to read The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 11: A. sample If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 12: B. consistent A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 13: C. causes The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 14: D. similar A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 15: A. limitations The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
Nhận xét
The Hilltop selection revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.