Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 72 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 72
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 72, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 72, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 72, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 72, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 72, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 72, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 72, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 72, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 72, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 72, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 72, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 72, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 72, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 72, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 72, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
A class tested a study app for three weeks. Students who chose to use the app completed more practice tasks, but they had also been more active learners before the trial. The class therefore wrote that the app was associated with higher completion, not that it had definitely caused the improvement.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, What is the main lesson of the passage about study app? (Set 72, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 72, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 72, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 72, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Forest reasoning case, What would be the best next step? (Set 72, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 2: B. was completed A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 3: C. repeating The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 4: D. more If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 5: B. who A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 6: C. since The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 7: D. had checked A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 8: A. but The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 9: C. sharing If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 10: D. to read A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 11: A. sample The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 12: B. consistent A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 13: C. causes The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 14: D. similar If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 15: A. limitations A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
Nhận xét
The Forest reasoning revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.