Đề ôn thi vào lớp 10 môn Tiếng Anh số 43 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề thi chính thức của một địa phương hay trường cụ thể.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 43
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language and Vocabulary – 5.0 points
- Question 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, If we ____ the source carefully, we may avoid a false conclusion. (Set 43, G1)
A. check
B. checked
C. checking
D. checks Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, The report ____ by the students last Friday. (Set 43, G2)
A. completed
B. was completed
C. is completing
D. has complete State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Mai suggested ____ the survey at a different time. (Set 43, G3)
A. repeat
B. to repeating
C. repeating
D. repeated If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, This method is ____ reliable than the first one. (Set 43, G4)
A. most
B. muchest
C. many
D. more After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, The student ____ collected the data explained the limitation. (Set 43, G5)
A. which
B. who
C. where
D. whose it Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Question 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, We have used this checklist ____ September. (Set 43, G6)
A. for
B. during
C. since
D. from Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, By the time the teacher arrived, the group ____ the figures twice. (Set 43, G7)
A. checks
B. is checking
C. will check
D. had checked State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, The result looked impressive, ____ the sample was very small. (Set 43, G8)
A. but
B. because
C. so
D. and If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 9 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Students should avoid ____ a claim before checking its source. (Set 43, G9)
A. share
B. to share
C. sharing
D. shared After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 10 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, The graph is easy ____ because its labels are clear. (Set 43, G10)
A. read
B. reading
C. to reading
D. to read Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
Part II. Cloze Reading – 2.5 points
- Question 11 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, A reliable study begins with a clear question. Researchers then choose a suitable ____. (Set 43, C1)
A. sample
B. colour
C. ticket
D. holiday Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 12 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Good evidence should be relevant to the claim and collected in a ____ way. (Set 43, C2)
A. careless
B. consistent
C. randomly written
D. silent State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 13 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, When two things change together, this does not always mean that one ____ the other. (Set 43, C3)
A. copies
B. prints
C. causes
D. borrows If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 14 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, A fair comparison tries to keep important conditions as ____ as possible. (Set 43, C4)
A. expensive
B. noisy
C. popular
D. similar After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 15 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, After analysing the data, a careful writer should mention important ____ in the study. (Set 43, C5)
A. limitations
B. decorations
C. passwords
D. schedules only Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
Part III. Reading – 2.5 points
The school canteen introduced a shorter menu to reduce waiting time. Average waiting time fell, but the school had also opened a second payment desk during the same week. Students realised that the improvement could have more than one cause and suggested testing the changes separately.
- Question 16 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, What is the main lesson of the passage about school canteen? (Set 43, R1)
A. The newest source is always correct.
B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence.
C. Large numbers always prove causation.
D. A single observation is enough. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Question 17 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Which action improved the quality of the conclusion? (Set 43, R2)
A. Ignoring the first result completely.
B. Removing all numbers from the report.
C. Checking another condition or source before deciding.
D. Choosing the most popular opinion. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Question 18 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Why was the first conclusion limited? (Set 43, R3)
A. It contained too many references.
B. It was written in English.
C. It used a computer.
D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Question 19 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, Which sentence is the most cautious academic claim? (Set 43, R4)
A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible.
B. This proves the cause with complete certainty.
C. No further checking is necessary.
D. Every similar case will have the same result. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Question 20 (0,5 điểm). In the Bridge selection case, What would be the best next step? (Set 43, R5)
A. Delete the data.
B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions.
C. Use only one participant.
D. Make a stronger claim immediately. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
- Question 1: A. check A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 2: B. was completed The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 3: C. repeating If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 4: D. more A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 5: B. who The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 6: C. since A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 7: D. had checked The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 8: A. but If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 9: C. sharing A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 10: D. to read The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 11: A. sample A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 12: B. consistent The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 13: C. causes If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 14: D. similar A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 15: A. limitations The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Question 16: B. A conclusion should match the quality and scope of the evidence. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Question 17: C. Checking another condition or source before deciding. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Question 18: D. It did not consider all relevant factors or conditions. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Question 19: A. The evidence suggests a relationship, but other explanations remain possible. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Question 20: B. Repeat or extend the check under comparable conditions. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
Nhận xét
The Bridge selection revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.