Đề ôn thi vào lớp 6 môn Tiếng Anh số 94 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề chính thức của một trường cụ thể và cấu trúc tuyển sinh thực tế có thể khác.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 6 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 94
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language – 4,0 points
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the best word: Students should ____ their answers before submitting. (Set 94, item 1)
A. check
B. checking
C. checked
D. checks State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the correct form: Mai ____ her plan yesterday. (Set 94, item 2)
A. change
B. changed
C. changes
D. is change If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the best connector: The idea looked good, ____ the first test showed a problem. (Set 94, item 3)
A. because
B. so
C. but
D. and After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the correct preposition: We collected data ____ three different days. (Set 94, item 4)
A. at
B. from of
C. by to
D. on Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the best phrase: If we use a larger sample, the result ____ be more reliable. (Set 94, item 5)
A. had
B. may
C. was
D. has Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the correct comparative: This method is ____ than the old one. (Set 94, item 6)
A. usefuler
B. most useful
C. more useful
D. usefully State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the correct question: ____ did the team repeat the survey? (Set 94, item 7)
A. Who
B. Whose
C. How many
D. Why If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Choose the best meaning of “reliable” in a study. (Set 94, item 8)
A. likely to give consistent, trustworthy results
B. very colourful
C. very expensive
D. always perfect After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
Part II. Reading – 3,0 points
Students surveyed how classmates travelled to school. They asked only the students who arrived early because those students were easy to meet. The results showed that most of the group walked or cycled. Later, the class realised that students who came by bus often arrived closer to the start time and had been missed. They repeated the survey at different times and obtained a more balanced picture.
- Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). In the Park mapping case, What was the main problem in the passage about bus survey?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
- Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). In the Park mapping case, What did the students or main character change after noticing the problem?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Which detail shows that the first conclusion or plan was incomplete?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
- Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). In the Park mapping case, What lesson about checking evidence can be learned from the passage?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Write one sentence explaining how the situation in bus survey could be tested or improved further. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
Part III. Writing – 3,0 points
- Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Rewrite using “because”: “The team changed the plan. The first result was not reliable.”. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
- Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Reorder the words: evidence / before / should / conclusion / a / check / We / making / . Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 3 (1,0 điểm). In the Park mapping case, Write 90–120 words about a time when checking information helped you make a better decision. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 94. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Part I. Language
- Câu 1: A. Correct answer: check. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 2: B. Correct answer: changed. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 3: C. Correct answer: but. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 4: D. Correct answer: on. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 5: B. Correct answer: may. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 6: C. Correct answer: more useful. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 7: D. Correct answer: Why. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 8: A. Correct answer: likely to give consistent, trustworthy results. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
Part II. Reading
- Câu 1. The answer should identify the concrete issue described in the passage, not a general problem. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 2. The answer should state the specific change made after the first observation or test. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 3. Use one detail showing that the first plan, sample or conclusion did not include all relevant information. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 4. A strong answer says that conclusions should be based on checked, relevant evidence and may need repeated testing. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 5. Any grammatically correct sentence proposing a fairer test, longer observation, better sample or clearer measure is acceptable. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
Part III. Writing
- Câu 1. The team changed the plan because the first result was not reliable. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 2. We should check evidence before making a conclusion. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 3. The paragraph should have a clear situation, the information checked, the decision made and the result. Accuracy, organisation and appropriate vocabulary are assessed. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
Nhận xét
The Park mapping revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.