Đề ôn thi vào lớp 6 môn Tiếng Anh số 2 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề chính thức của một trường cụ thể và cấu trúc tuyển sinh thực tế có thể khác.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 6 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 2
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language – 4,0 points
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the best word: Students should ____ their answers before submitting. (Set 2, item 1)
A. check
B. checking
C. checked
D. checks Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the correct form: Mai ____ her plan yesterday. (Set 2, item 2)
A. change
B. changed
C. changes
D. is change Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the best connector: The idea looked good, ____ the first test showed a problem. (Set 2, item 3)
A. because
B. so
C. but
D. and State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the correct preposition: We collected data ____ three different days. (Set 2, item 4)
A. at
B. from of
C. by to
D. on If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the best phrase: If we use a larger sample, the result ____ be more reliable. (Set 2, item 5)
A. had
B. may
C. was
D. has After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the correct comparative: This method is ____ than the old one. (Set 2, item 6)
A. usefuler
B. most useful
C. more useful
D. usefully Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Câu 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the correct question: ____ did the team repeat the survey? (Set 2, item 7)
A. Who
B. Whose
C. How many
D. Why Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Choose the best meaning of “reliable” in a study. (Set 2, item 8)
A. likely to give consistent, trustworthy results
B. very colourful
C. very expensive
D. always perfect State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
Part II. Reading – 3,0 points
A group of students wanted more classmates to use the reading corner. They first added many colourful posters, but the number of readers did not change much. Then they asked students why they rarely stayed there. Most said the chairs were uncomfortable and the books were difficult to find. The group moved the shelves, added clear labels and brought in a few cushions. Visits increased during the next two weeks. The students learned that asking users about a problem can be more useful than guessing.
- Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). In the Center analysis case, What was the main problem in the passage about reading corner?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). In the Center analysis case, What did the students or main character change after noticing the problem?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
- Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Which detail shows that the first conclusion or plan was incomplete?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
- Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). In the Center analysis case, What lesson about checking evidence can be learned from the passage?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Write one sentence explaining how the situation in reading corner could be tested or improved further. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
Part III. Writing – 3,0 points
- Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Rewrite using “because”: “The team changed the plan. The first result was not reliable.”. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Reorder the words: evidence / before / should / conclusion / a / check / We / making / . Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
- Câu 3 (1,0 điểm). In the Center analysis case, Write 90–120 words about a time when checking information helped you make a better decision. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 2. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Part I. Language
- Câu 1: A. Correct answer: check. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 2: B. Correct answer: changed. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 3: C. Correct answer: but. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 4: D. Correct answer: on. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 5: B. Correct answer: may. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 6: C. Correct answer: more useful. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 7: D. Correct answer: Why. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 8: A. Correct answer: likely to give consistent, trustworthy results. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
Part II. Reading
- Câu 1. The answer should identify the concrete issue described in the passage, not a general problem. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 2. The answer should state the specific change made after the first observation or test. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 3. Use one detail showing that the first plan, sample or conclusion did not include all relevant information. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 4. A strong answer says that conclusions should be based on checked, relevant evidence and may need repeated testing. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 5. Any grammatically correct sentence proposing a fairer test, longer observation, better sample or clearer measure is acceptable. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
Part III. Writing
- Câu 1. The team changed the plan because the first result was not reliable. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 2. We should check evidence before making a conclusion. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 3. The paragraph should have a clear situation, the information checked, the decision made and the result. Accuracy, organisation and appropriate vocabulary are assessed. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
Nhận xét
The Center analysis revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.