Đề ôn thi vào lớp 6 môn Tiếng Anh số 50 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề chính thức của một trường cụ thể và cấu trúc tuyển sinh thực tế có thể khác.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 6 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 50
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language – 4,0 points
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the best word: Students should ____ their answers before submitting. (Set 50, item 1)
A. check
B. checking
C. checked
D. checks If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the correct form: Mai ____ her plan yesterday. (Set 50, item 2)
A. change
B. changed
C. changes
D. is change After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the best connector: The idea looked good, ____ the first test showed a problem. (Set 50, item 3)
A. because
B. so
C. but
D. and Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the correct preposition: We collected data ____ three different days. (Set 50, item 4)
A. at
B. from of
C. by to
D. on Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the best phrase: If we use a larger sample, the result ____ be more reliable. (Set 50, item 5)
A. had
B. may
C. was
D. has State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the correct comparative: This method is ____ than the old one. (Set 50, item 6)
A. usefuler
B. most useful
C. more useful
D. usefully If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the correct question: ____ did the team repeat the survey? (Set 50, item 7)
A. Who
B. Whose
C. How many
D. Why After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Câu 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Choose the best meaning of “reliable” in a study. (Set 50, item 8)
A. likely to give consistent, trustworthy results
B. very colourful
C. very expensive
D. always perfect Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
Part II. Reading – 3,0 points
Mai made a study timetable before an important test. She planned every minute and left no free time. For three days she followed the plan, but then she became tired and started skipping tasks. Mai changed the schedule by adding short breaks and choosing three important tasks each evening. She completed fewer tasks on paper, yet she finished the important ones more consistently.
- Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, What was the main problem in the passage about study timetable?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, What did the students or main character change after noticing the problem?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
- Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Which detail shows that the first conclusion or plan was incomplete?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
- Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, What lesson about checking evidence can be learned from the passage?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
- Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Write one sentence explaining how the situation in study timetable could be tested or improved further. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
Part III. Writing – 3,0 points
- Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Rewrite using “because”: “The team changed the plan. The first result was not reliable.”. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Reorder the words: evidence / before / should / conclusion / a / check / We / making / . Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
- Câu 3 (1,0 điểm). In the Garden monitoring case, Write 90–120 words about a time when checking information helped you make a better decision. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 50. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Part I. Language
- Câu 1: A. Correct answer: check. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 2: B. Correct answer: changed. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 3: C. Correct answer: but. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 4: D. Correct answer: on. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 5: B. Correct answer: may. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 6: C. Correct answer: more useful. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 7: D. Correct answer: Why. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 8: A. Correct answer: likely to give consistent, trustworthy results. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
Part II. Reading
- Câu 1. The answer should identify the concrete issue described in the passage, not a general problem. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 2. The answer should state the specific change made after the first observation or test. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 3. Use one detail showing that the first plan, sample or conclusion did not include all relevant information. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 4. A strong answer says that conclusions should be based on checked, relevant evidence and may need repeated testing. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 5. Any grammatically correct sentence proposing a fairer test, longer observation, better sample or clearer measure is acceptable. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
Part III. Writing
- Câu 1. The team changed the plan because the first result was not reliable. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 2. We should check evidence before making a conclusion. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 3. The paragraph should have a clear situation, the information checked, the decision made and the result. Accuracy, organisation and appropriate vocabulary are assessed. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Nhận xét
The Garden monitoring revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.