This self-authored practice paper uses a water station context to combine grade-appropriate language, reading evidence and writing; it is a reference exercise rather than an official school paper.
ĐỀ ÔN THI HỌC KÌ 1 TIẾNG ANH LỚP 12 – ĐỀ SỐ 14
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Phần I. Language – 3,0 điểm
6 câu, mỗi câu 0,5 điểm.
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). No sooner ____ the revised table than they noticed the denominator error.
A. had they checked
B. they had checked
C. did they checked
D. they check - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). The team ____ have documented the change when it altered the interpretation.
A. should to
B. should
C. shoulded
D. is should - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). A small association ____ an effect, but stronger evidence is needed before a causal claim.
A. must prove
B. always proves
C. might indicate
D. cannot ever suggest - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). Unless the exclusions ____ transparently, readers cannot assess their impact.
A. report
B. will reported
C. reported themselves
D. are reported - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). The supplementary file, ____ contained all model specifications, reduced ambiguity.
A. which
B. who
C. whose researcher
D. where person - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). Replicability is strengthened when ____ .
A. only successful analyses are published
B. methods and analysis steps are documented clearly enough to repeat
C. the dataset is hidden
D. definitions change after results are seen
Phần II. Reading – 3,0 điểm
Linh and a student team examined a water refill station. Their purpose was to make reusable bottles easier to refill. During the first observation, lines became long at lunch. Instead of treating that result as final, the team introduced a second tap. In the next observation, waiting time decreased. The students recorded the conditions of each trial so that later comparisons would not rely on memory alone.
Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). What was introduced or compared in the water station scenario?
Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). For the water station activity, why did the students carry out the activity?
Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). In a water station practice task, what went wrong or became difficult in the first observation?
Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). Using the water station context, which modification did the team make?
Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). As part of the water station exercise, what result followed the modification?
Phần III. Writing – 4,0 điểm
Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). Rewrite one idea from the water station passage with a third conditional or modal perfect.
Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). Write one sentence acknowledging a limitation of the water station activity.
Câu 3 (2,0 điểm). In a water station practice task, write 170–220 words arguing for complete and transparent reporting when several analyses or outcomes are possible.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Phần I
- Câu 1: A. No sooner … than uses inversion with past perfect.
- Câu 2: B. Should have + past participle expresses a past recommendation.
- Câu 3: C. Might indicate is appropriately cautious.
- Câu 4: D. Unless-clause can use present passive.
- Câu 5: A. Which refers to a file.
- Câu 6: B. Clear documentation supports repetition and verification.
Phần II
Câu 1. A water refill station.
Câu 2. To make reusable bottles easier to refill.
Câu 3. Lines became long at lunch.
Câu 4. A second tap.
Câu 5. Waiting time decreased.
Phần III
Câu 1. Use the form to discuss an unreal past alternative.
Câu 2. Use formal, precise language.
Câu 3. Include a practical example.
Nhận xét
Review this water station paper by separating grammar errors, evidence missed in the reading, and claims in the writing that need clearer support.