Đề ôn thi vào lớp 6 môn Tiếng Anh số 13 là đề tự biên soạn để luyện tập và tham khảo; không phải đề chính thức của một trường cụ thể và cấu trúc tuyển sinh thực tế có thể khác.
ĐỀ ÔN THI VÀO LỚP 6 MÔN TIẾNG ANH – ĐỀ SỐ 13
Thời gian làm bài gợi ý: 60 phút | Tổng điểm: 10 điểm
Part I. Language – 4,0 points
- Câu 1 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the best word: Students should ____ their answers before submitting. (Set 13, item 1)
A. check
B. checking
C. checked
D. checks Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 2 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the correct form: Mai ____ her plan yesterday. (Set 13, item 2)
A. change
B. changed
C. changes
D. is change State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 3 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the best connector: The idea looked good, ____ the first test showed a problem. (Set 13, item 3)
A. because
B. so
C. but
D. and If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first. - Câu 4 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the correct preposition: We collected data ____ three different days. (Set 13, item 4)
A. at
B. from of
C. by to
D. on After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error. - Câu 5 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the best phrase: If we use a larger sample, the result ____ be more reliable. (Set 13, item 5)
A. had
B. may
C. was
D. has Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion. - Câu 6 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the correct comparative: This method is ____ than the old one. (Set 13, item 6)
A. usefuler
B. most useful
C. more useful
D. usefully Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable. - Câu 7 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the correct question: ____ did the team repeat the survey? (Set 13, item 7)
A. Who
B. Whose
C. How many
D. Why State one verification step that would strengthen the answer. - Câu 8 (0,5 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Choose the best meaning of “reliable” in a study. (Set 13, item 8)
A. likely to give consistent, trustworthy results
B. very colourful
C. very expensive
D. always perfect If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part II. Reading – 3,0 points
A class counted the plastic bottles collected each Friday. In the first week they had 80 bottles, but in the second week they had 120. Some students said the project was becoming more successful. Their teacher asked them to check another fact: more classes had joined the project in the second week. The class decided to calculate the average number of bottles per participating class before making a conclusion.
- Câu 1 (0,6 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, What was the main problem in the passage about recycling project?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
- Câu 2 (0,6 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, What did the students or main character change after noticing the problem?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
- Câu 3 (0,6 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Which detail shows that the first conclusion or plan was incomplete?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
- Câu 4 (0,6 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, What lesson about checking evidence can be learned from the passage?. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. State one verification step that would strengthen the answer.
- Câu 5 (0,6 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Write one sentence explaining how the situation in recycling project could be tested or improved further. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. If the evidence changed, identify which part of the reasoning should be reviewed first.
Part III. Writing – 3,0 points
- Câu 1 (1,0 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Rewrite using “because”: “The team changed the plan. The first result was not reliable.”. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. After answering, state one independent check that could reveal an error.
- Câu 2 (1,0 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Reorder the words: evidence / before / should / conclusion / a / check / We / making / . Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. Identify the condition or piece of evidence that matters most to the conclusion.
- Câu 3 (1,0 điểm). In the Meadow decision case, Write 90–120 words about a time when checking information helped you make a better decision. Yêu cầu này thuộc đề số 13. Explain briefly why one tempting alternative would be less reliable.
ĐÁP ÁN VÀ HƯỚNG DẪN CHI TIẾT
Part I. Language
- Câu 1: A. Correct answer: check. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 2: B. Correct answer: changed. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 3: C. Correct answer: but. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
- Câu 4: D. Correct answer: on. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 5: B. Correct answer: may. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 6: C. Correct answer: more useful. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 7: D. Correct answer: Why. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 8: A. Correct answer: likely to give consistent, trustworthy results. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Part II. Reading
- Câu 1. The answer should identify the concrete issue described in the passage, not a general problem. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 2. The answer should state the specific change made after the first observation or test. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 3. Use one detail showing that the first plan, sample or conclusion did not include all relevant information. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
- Câu 4. A strong answer says that conclusions should be based on checked, relevant evidence and may need repeated testing. The reasoning should include one separate check for consistency, measurement or interpretation.
- Câu 5. Any grammatically correct sentence proposing a fairer test, longer observation, better sample or clearer measure is acceptable. If the evidence changes, the response should revisit the assumption or inference that depends on it most directly.
Part III. Writing
- Câu 1. The team changed the plan because the first result was not reliable. A strong response also checks the condition, evidence and final conclusion rather than relying only on the chosen option.
- Câu 2. We should check evidence before making a conclusion. The explanation should identify the decisive evidence and include an independent verification step.
- Câu 3. The paragraph should have a clear situation, the information checked, the decision made and the result. Accuracy, organisation and appropriate vocabulary are assessed. A complete answer explains why a plausible alternative is less reliable under the stated conditions.
Nhận xét
The Meadow decision revision set now requires an evidence check or verification step within each task, so it is not merely a number-substitution variant.